MONARCHY
MONARCHY
On 19 of May I was watching the royal wedding of Prince
Henry and Megan. That got me thinking of royalties at large. The fact of kings
and queen still have power in this world got me thinking. I hear people scream
democracy, but they say keep our kings. The question I asked is what the deal
of these kings and queens is.
One story that got me thinking is the story of King
Solomon's story. King Solomon had one thousand wives. His story is actually
recorded in the Bible in the book of kings. 11 King: Solomon, however, loved
many foreign women besides Pharaoh’s daughter—Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites,
Sidonians and Hittites. I always wonder Solomon married a thousand wives.
Solomon was considered the most wises individual within the Bible yet he
married a thousand women. Did he inter marry all those women for a plan? I am
sure as the wises person on earth he must of had a motive to marry all those
women.
Reading the Bible it described King Solomon as a man who
liked women. I can’t believe that it was his motive. I saw something within the
text of Kings. Inter marrying for King Solomon brought peace for Israel (he was
the king of Israel). When royalty from different nations intermarry it brings
peace within the kingdoms. The peace it brings is large. I thing that was King
Solomon’s idea and approach.
King Solomon brought peace for ISREAL in the most remarkable
way. Once the most powerful country in the world Egypt was manipulated by King
Solomon. King Solomon married the Pharaohs daughter that brought Israel (at that
time) peace with Egypt and that is remarkable. The fact that as a king, you can
plan something so genius.
I was learning about the rule of Queen Victoria. She is most
probably the most talked royalty ever. It was in her rule, when England became
the most sovereign country in the face of the world. The colonization taken
into full practice by Queen Victoria. She is truly amazingly genius.
What else she did which is just a claim was marry her
children to other royalty. Queen Victoria married of almost all her children’s
to royal lines. Queens daughter “Victoria” was married of to the German Emperor
Fredrick III. The Queens son Alfred, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha married Grand
Duchess Maria Alexandrovna of Russia. Queen gave his other son Prince Arthur,
Duke of Connaught and Strathearn the duty to Govern Canada and marry Princess
Louise Margaret of Prussia. Another son Prince Leopold, Duke of Albany married Princess
Helena of Waldeck and Pyrmont, was the daughter of George Victor, Prince of
Waldeck and Pyrmont (regions now in Germany) and his wife. Princess Beatrice
married Prince Henry of Battenberg of Germany. Princess Alice married Louis IV,
Grand Duke of Hesse. Edward VII married Alexandra of Denmark who was the
empress of India.
Queen Victoria’s doing was something remarkably genius and
flipping breathe takings. All of the United Kingdom’s wealth is all owed to
Queen Victoria. During her rule she ensured the prosperity of her country. She
allowed colonization of America, Australia, Southern Africa and India. I may have
forgotten a few countries. But clearly she didn’t have good successors.
Her successors undid everything she worked for. Her
successors played barely any role in the two world wars. They have lost control
of their own country to majority parliament. From a world where the royals of
England made laws, to Prime minister taking control. This is shameful. I know
in a perspective of the every civilian it worked out for the best, although on
the perspective of royalty it does not work out. There have been ministers and
civilians in England already just trying to wipe out the institution of
monarchy as it cost the tax collectors millions.
Queen Sheba |
I was looking whether countries still have monarchy taking
control. The results kind of shook me. The world we are living in today isn’t
any different from 100 years ago. The difference we have is technology and the
sex.
1.
Swaziland – Ruled by Mswati III
2.
Saudi Arabia – King Abdullah
3.
Bhutan – King Jigme Khesar
4.
Monaco – Prince Albert II
5.
Bahrain – Sheih Hamad
This is only the most famous. I know in South Africa the
president does have some things that must be ran by kings. During the Apartheid
the kings of the tribes were still treated with absolute respect. Which made me
realize maybe there’s more to royalty than I anticipated.
There is a constant need for animals to make rulers within
their society. With bees there is a Queen Bee which is in terms the ruler of a
hive of bees. With wild dogs like wolfs they depend on rankings to determine
the ruler. So perhaps it is natural for a ruler to me established.
What I learnt is the animal that is most adaptive to the
environment is given a better opportunity to be a leader. So this could be an
animal with the best natural selection, for example the giraffe with the longest
neck (not to say that it’s an actual thing). Within domestic dogs, the dog with
the biggest muscle is more likely to be the alpha dog. I suppose being with
that dog can give protection, gives fear to other dogs, more likely to catch
pray (if they were in the wild) and shuxx event get all the ladies.
Although with humans it is different. I suppose we as humans
want the same thing as the dogs. We want our king that protects our interest,
gives protection, displays themselves respectable o other human kingdom. I am
guessing money gives all of that. I mean Queen Victoria gave her subjects
wealth and prosperity, protection and sets herself respectable.
The Monarchy ruling dates back centuries back |
It is pretty clear that the days of monarchy are not dying
the way they ought to be. We are in the 20 first century yet monarchies rule
are still infecting us. The power of royals are way too much to ignore. Due to
that the whole institution needs to be stopped. I mean the full exercise of
power of monarchy is displayed currently in North Korea as Kim Un being the
raining leader. There have been reports that the royalties in England still
have a say in the country, that she makes the decision whether or not to pass a
law. That is a lot of power within my opinion. Monarchy are as well are
expensive towards the tax collectors. Did you know that the most Monarchy in
the world control military of the country (e.g: England).
We spend a portion of our tax ensure the Zulu king and Xhosa
King have Bentley’s. You have the king of Swaziland as wealthy as he is, living
in one of the poorest countries in the world. The money we pay to keep these
royalty up there can be used feed the poor or perhaps fund entrepreneurs and
empower them.
But I do understand the importance of Monarchy. People
believe the family assigned at that royalty are sent by the God they believe. A
king has more emotional and spiritual meaning than a president. Perhaps the
days of Monarchy are too much to let go.
“God save the King”
“Long live the King”
A king or queen is a big word.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comment to Yondlers